Thursday, March 18, 2021

Projects

Keeping updated on projects.  Three categories: projects I'm currently working on, projects that I've started but are currently halted (for whatever reasons), and future projects piling up.

Current: lego sorting, bird flock flight tracking, meteor echoes

Background/halted: TESS steady stars, photometry (eclipsing binaries, asteroids, planetary moons), qNMR, TNO detection using stellar occultations

Future: speckle interferometry, asteroid occultations, meteor detection/tracking, satellite detection/tracking, twilight colors, radio telescope

There might be other inactive projects, but this is what I can think of....

Some details:

Lego Sorting: this is an active project which I'm documenting elsewhere (see this link).  This project would generally make life for most Lego people much more enjoyable, and has huge commercial potential.

Bird flight tracking: at this point, this is more of just an interest to me than anything else.  I enjoy watching large flocks of cranes spend their winters in my area as they fly overhead in their interesting and complex formations.  I've written software to take video frame input, and detect and track the paths of birds (of any kind: cranes, swallows, pigeons, etc.) as they move across the sky.  I'm especially curious to see how they move in relation to one another.  Would some kind of biologist be interested in any of this?

Meteor echoes: I've written software that can take the audio from livemeteors.com and detect meteor echo events.  The software can then make several measurements, including begin and end time, event duration, intervals between events, and peak and total amplitudes.  I've written a draft report on what I've done sofar (available upon request).  The only thing I'd like to add to this is to look at data from different times of year to see if I can detect any shower activity.  Not sure what else to do with this.  Unfortunately, it looks like this kind of observation is going away since it relies on TV stations emitting a signal on 'Channel 2' (55.24 MHz) or 'Channel 3' (61.260 MHz) -- which are going away in the next few months.  I need to look to see if there are other ways to make similar kinds of observations.

TESS steady stars: everyone is hyperventilating (understandably so!!!) about the stellar activity seen by the TESS observatory.  What's interesting to me is to find stars that show NO activity.  Once found (I've already found several candidates from Sector 1), I'd like to understand WHY they're so steady (at least on the TESS timeframe).

Photometry: I started doing very well collecting data and making measurements, but if one of my goals is to publish this data to AAVSO, then it must be calibrated to one of the standard photometric standards (like UBVRI).  At the moment, all I have is R, G, and B filters.  There is a way to calculate the transformation functions between these two, but it looks like that produces uncertainties that make the measurements almost useless (at least at the moment).  The way forward is to either acquire a set of UBV(RI) filters, and restart the photometric journey with these, OR use what I have and see if I can improve the accuracy & precision of the transformations.  Regardless, in order to do accurate photometric measurements, I need to observe 'standard stars'.  These are stars of known brightness and color (even though they might be variable -- see TESS above) that I can use to get 0th, 1st, and 2nd order extinction coefficients.  It's all explained in an excellent book 'Astronomical Techniques' by Hiltner (see chapter 8).  At this point I need to choose a direction and go with it.  Once that's done, then wow there's a LOT of things that can be done, some of which I mentioned in my brief above.

qNMR: This is quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.  It's an analytical technique to tell me what compounds are in a prepared sample and how much of each compound there is.  Current testing labs primarily use High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and a combination of Gas Chromatography (GC) and Mass Spectroscopy (MS).  These methods are expensive and slow and are virtually blind to the contents of the sample.  qNMR will revolutionize how chemical analysis is done -- especially samples that are complex (food, soil, plants, etc.).  Huge commercial potential.

TNO detection: I've got software that takes orbital information of any object (TNOs or otherwise) from the JPL Horizons website and calculates position (RA and DEC), distance (AU), apparent size (micro-arcsec), apparent velocity (mas per second), time it takes to move one object diameter (depends on apparent size and apparent velocity), and maybe other things too.  The first goal is to get back to where I was a couple of years ago and come up with an occultation rate given a certain number of TNOs and stars.  The ultimate goal is to find an indirect way (alternative to direct imaging which for most of these objects will be impossible since they're so small and therefore so faint) of detecting TNOs.

Radio Telescope / Interferometer: I'd like to build a radio telescope and do the same kinds of things I'm doing in the optical -- photometry, etc.  Start simple and go from there.  My property is about 660 ft on each side (it's an almost perfect square of 10 acres), so I have a diagonal of about 900 feet (about 275 meters).  Radio Jove is set up for 20.1 Mhz, which has a wavelength of 14.915 meters.  Therefore, the resolution of this interferometer would be 1.22 lambda / D = (1.22 * 14.915) / 275 = 0.06616 radians, or 3.79 degrees.  Not great resolution, but probably something can be done.  I know very little about radio astronomy when it comes to hardware and data, so in order to get this project going I'll need to do a lot of homework first.  First step might be to do a Radio Jove kind of project just to get my feet wet.

I recently acquired a ZWO-ASI385MC from a very generous friend.  This will allow the following four projects to move forward.  I'll need to acquire a dedicated Win10 machine to run this.

Speckle Interferometry: this is mainly just to do it.  For those of you that don't know, SI is a post-processing technique to sharpen astronomical images.  I did this as a student 30 years ago and hardly understood what I was doing.  My understanding and knowledge has grown a little since then, and I think I can at least get to a level where I'm satisfied with the results.  But due to the small aperture sizes, I'll be limited to pretty bright targets (I might be able to get to 5th magnitude with the video-rate exposure times I need to 'freeze' the atmosphere).  Small aperture also means only a few speckles.  With an 8" primary and normal seeing, I'd expect to see about 10 speckles on average.  Targets will include binary stars, Jupiter (using it's moons as point sources), and that's about it.  Not sure what else to do with this.

Asteroid occultations: these don't require as short exposures as speckle does.  I'll need to test this, but I'm guessing that a 0.1 second exposure will get me down to about 8th mag.  That's still pretty limiting since there aren't many 8th mag stars or brighter that get occulted.  I'd like to observe occultations of stars by trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) since those occultations are usually a pretty long (10's of seconds, or minutes) so I could increase the exposure time to see fainter stars (which means more occultation opportunities).  The most important thing about asteroid occultations is the timing.

Meteor and Satellite detection and tracking: the ZWO camera comes with a fish-eye lens that appears to have a pretty wide field of view.  This means it has the potential of being used as an all-sky camera.  This opens up the possibility of satellite and meteor observations, but also non-astronomical observations like clouds, birds, and other transient events.  This could also be used in the twilight project.  Meteors could be measured (brightness profile, color, location in the sky, motion, etc.).  Satellites observed can have their positions measured and compared to calculated orbital data.  Orbit changes or unknown satellites could be observed.

There are other projects I've worked on the past and would like to get back on them, or projects I'd like to try:
  • Using IRIS data to map the south atlantic anomoly
  • Twilight observations: this is a project I did for someone several years ago, but was stopped because the effect they were expecting / looking for didn't appear.  However, how the sky color changes at various stages of twilights caught my interest and I'd like to get back on that to see where it leads me.  The ZWO camera can be used for this, too.
  • Obtain occultation timing spacially not temporaly

Saturday, June 20, 2020

Computer Woes

This is the short story: got a 'new' computer a few years ago.  Turned it on, installed Linux, made all the updates, ready to go.

Monsoon storm zapped the ethernet on the motherboard.  Couldn't get a USB ethernet adapter to work.

Few months later, tried another ethernet adapter and that worked.  Finished all the updates and was ready to go.  Oh, one last thing -- updated the operating system from Fedora 26 to Fedora 28.  Did this, and then saw that the ethernet adapter wasn't working again.  Threw in the towel -- put the machine in storage where it was for a couple years.

Got ANOTHER ethernet adapter.  Pulled the machine out of storage and tried it.  It worked right away.  Updated python, got all the astronomical python libraries installed, etc, etc, etc.  Upgraded from 2 to 8 GB of memory.  Now I'm really rip-roaring ready to go!

Last weekend I planned on moving from my current 'work' computer to this 'new' one.  Went to turn it on and ----- nothing.  It won't turn on!  Fans spin for about 1 second and then stop.  From what I can tell, this means that something happened to the motherboard.

So now the machine is sitting on the floor giving me the finger (again!!) and I'm just staring at it.

Frustrating....

Wednesday, June 17, 2020

Fire in the Catalinas (61" Kuiper, Catalina Sky Survey, etc)

Another big fire in the Catalina mountains north of Tucson.  This mountain range is the home of many observatories, including the 61" scope on Mt Bigelow I used for my white dwarf photometry work back in the early 90's, and the Catalina Sky Survey on Mt Lemmon which is hunting for near-earth and earth-crossing asteroids.  There isn't a lot of vegetation at the CSS site, so if they're vigilant it'll be ok as far as fire protection goes.  The 61" (there's also a 16" Schmidt camera there), though, is surrounded by trees.

In both cases, the SMOKE is gonna be a big problem.

Take care of yourselves up there!

Thursday, June 11, 2020

RTFM -- Tess Sector 1 Manual!


All I have to do is RTFM and many (maybe all???) of my TESS questions are answered!

https://archive.stsci.edu/missions/tess/doc/tess_drn/tess_sector_01_drn01_v02.pdf

Citizen Science rant that I almost posted to the SETI youtube channel ...

... but changed my mind and posted it here instead where it's guaranteed to never be seen by anyone except YOU!

Here is it:

The term 'Citizen Science' as it's currently being used is very deceptive.  The person you interviewed is nothing more than a 'Data Collector'.  Don't get me wrong!  Data collection is VERY important and is very exciting and technical, but he's not doing science!  They're fooled into thinking they're actually doing science by YOU calling it 'Citizen Science' to make what they are ACTUALLY doing sound a little more appealing.  All they're doing is participating in the scientific process, part of which is the tedious process of data collection.  Tedious AND expensive!  So you fool these people into willingly and happily collect the data for you -- for free!!!  Tom Sawyer did the same thing and got away with it just like you are.  Brilliant.

Are any of these 'Citizen Scientists' co-authors or authors on any papers, or are they maybe just mentioned in the acknowledgements?  If the former, then yes they are 'Citizen Scientists'.  But if the latter, they are 'Data Collectors'.

Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Steady Stars

Here are stars in the Sector 1 field of view.  Note that both axes in this plot are on a logarithmic scale.  The x-axis is the brightness (larger numbers, brighter star).  The y-axis is the 1-sigma standard deviation as a percentage of brightness (smaller number, more precise or more steady).

Here are the stars that fall into those categories (marked in red) have a brightness of more than 1000 and a percent deviation of less than 1%:


Here's a plot (on a linear scale) showing a sample of these stars -- the brightest ones (8 stars in this sample of about 2400 have values greater than 10000):

Very interesting that even these aren't so steady.

Not sure what's going on with the data from data points 1000-1100.  Also not sure why there's a discontinuity in all the data about mid-way through.  There may be other systematic things that I need to understand and make sure I take into account.

I need to look at some fainter stars that are also steady to see how those light curves look.

Monday, June 8, 2020

TESS Overload

I just ran a script that took my machine 21 hours to complete!  It measured the brightness of about 2200 stars (identified by the IRAF task 'starfind') in a 1000x1000 pixel area (translating to 6.3 by 6.3 degrees in the sky) of Sector 1, Camera 1, CCD 1.  I did this for the entire data acquisition period, which went from day 206 to day 234 of 2018 (29 days!!).

I measured the brightness by the computing the mean and mode of a small sample box centered on the star.  The mean value is the brightness of the star plus the background.  I noticed quite a while ago that the background does change.  I need to investigate why, but for now I'm just accepting it as something that happens.  The background in my small box is estimated by computing the mode -- the most common value.  The star takes up 3 or 4 of the 49 pixels I'm sampling.  The other pixels are part of the background and will be the most common value.  To say it in stat verbage: the distribution of brightness is very non-gaussian.

So by subtracting the mode from the mean, I get a rough measurement of the brightness of the star with no varying background.

What I see it astonishing but totally expected!  I made some plots.  As I said, there are over 2000 stars, so there are 2000+ plots!  I put five plots on a single image, so that's only a little over 400 images.  Here are some examples to show the diversity.  X-axis is image number which will track time.  Every point is 30 minutes after the previous one.  The y-axis is self-scaled to whatever the data is telling gnuplot is the min and max.

2nd from the top is an eclipsing binary.

4th from the top is a very complex pattern

Top one low amp, high freq.  4th from top is complex again

And actually I'm interested in all of this for something completely in left field -- but I think is very important that no-one is talking about.

Which stars vary the least, or are closest to constant?  Do 'known' and used standard stars used in photometric measurements show any variation on these timescales?  I'm gonna see if there are any Landolt standards in this CCD's field of view.

Looking at all of these plots, there are only a handful that are totally flat (with noise, of course).  Are 'constant' stars rare?  What conditions make stars 'constant'?

All kinds of interesting questions -- and no one seems to be talking about it.

Anyhow I'm very pleased with this simple and very interesting experiment!  Except for the search for the most constant star, I have no idea where this will lead.